Megalomania.me

Escribir corto, para concluir antes de hastiar.

Natan Gesher | Sharav | Colossal Reviews | Megalomania:me | The Magic SEO Ball | LinkedIn | Facebook | Mastodon

Are Kuwait and Israel really at war?

Monday 2 March 2015

Israeli woman in NY barred from Kuwaiti airline:

An Israeli woman who has lived in the United States for the last 15 years was barred from boarding a Kuwait Airways flight in New York because of her Israeli citizenship… A Kuwaiti law prohibits Israeli citizens from flying on Kuwait Airways… Eliazarov has filed a discrimination lawsuit against the airline, which argues that the airline policy violates both state and federal civil rights laws.

Putting aside what I believe to be the relevant legal issues here (federal law in the US prohibits private discrimination in public accommodations on the basis of national origin; federal law in the US also prohibits participation in the Arab League’s boycott of Israel), there’s another question lurking behind this story: Kuwait apparently considers itself to be at war with Israel. Why?

Filed Under: Blog

Kevin Spacey does “South Carolina”

Saturday 28 February 2015

What linguists say about Kevin Spacey’s bizarre Southern accent on House of Cards:

…the show has always had one big, scenery-chewing constant: Kevin Spacey’s Southern accent… is Spacey’s accent accurate at all? … Spacey is hitting certain features very well, some distinct sounds are being ignored… Frank Underwood sounds like a Southerner born before World War II…

I’ve noticed a few interesting things about people’s accents – especially the accents of people who have migrated from one country or region to another – in the nearly two decades that I’ve been listening to them carefully. One is that people who are consciously using a “prestige” accent can be very convincing for short periods, and when they aren’t under stress, but that when they need to speak at length and don’t have prepared remarks, or when they are in difficult or stressful situations, they’ll frequently revert to their more “natural” accents.

In the first two seasons of House of Cards, I observed quite the opposite from Kevin Spacey’s character Frank Underwood. During normal conversation or soliloquy, he used the simulated “South Carolina” accent described by Vox, but when his character was under pressure, the accent got milder or disappeared altogether.

This is the opposite of what I’d expect: after a long political career in Washington DC, Frank Underwood’s “South Carolina” accent should be almost completely neutralized. But the longer he speaks at any given time, or the more strain that’s being put on him, the more evident his character’s roots should be.

I’m surprised at Kevin Spacey’s oversight on this matter.

Filed Under: Blog

The Ethicist: 22 February 2015

Wednesday 18 February 2015

Once upon a time, I was a 21 year old college student, living alone in Manhattan, and I considered myself to be “between ethical systems at the moment.”

Fast forward more than a decade: at 33, I have moved to Jerusalem, then Tel Aviv, then San Francisco and back to Manhattan (with some time in the suburbs in between), acquired a career and a dog, grown horizontally, and still not quite settled down with any particular ethical system.

Back then, I was introduced to “The Ethicist,” Randy Cohen’s ethical questions column in the New York Times Sunday Magazine, by this question:

The courteous and competent real-estate agent I’d just hired to rent my house shocked and offended me when, after we signed our contract, he refused to shake my hand, saying that as an Orthodox Jew he did not touch women. As a feminist, I oppose sex discrimination of all sorts. However, I also support freedom of religious expression. How do I balance these conflicting values? Should I tear up our contract? J.L., New York

Cohen’s answer was not just stupidly wrong, but destructively wrong: he actually advised the writer to terminate her business agreement because she didn’t approve of her real estate agent’s religious practice (not to touch women besides his wife), while attempting to compare this practice to Jim Crow laws.

As the case was, I had a lot of observant Jewish friends at the time, and had myself experienced a similar situation in the past: when introduced by my social circle to a Jewish woman, I reached out to shake her hand, but she shook her head no. Later somebody else had taken me aside and explained נגיעה‬ to me. I was extremely embarrassed, but more for her than for myself: her refusal to shake my hand was so rude and inappropriate that it made her look deeply petty and irresponsible. The friend who explained this to me added that the way he was raised was that he should not initiate physical contact with women who weren’t his relatives, but that he should never refuse a handshake in a way that would make a stranger feel uncomfortable, lest he hurt that person’s feelings and create a חילול השם‎.

Randy Cohen’s questioner’s real estate agent may have handled his handshake situation terribly, but it’s difficult to tell from the question whether that’s the case; another possibility is that the questioner chose to create drama where none was necessary. Either way, Cohen was very wrong to advise someone to let her feelings – probably immature and narcissistic – get in the way of a rational business decision. I decided then to start reading The Ethicist every week, and think about how I would answer the questions differently.

Until now, I have done so.

Today, The Times is relaunching The Ethicist as a podcast with discussion-format articles, so I have decided to take my hobby of Ethicist critiquing online as well. Can I Ask My Neighbors to Quiet Their Baby? will be my first blog post in an ongoing series.

Question:

A couple downstairs has started letting their baby cry it out. Having no kids myself, I don’t know if this is a valid parenting strategy. What I do know is that it kept me up for an hour at 2 a.m. last night and has woken me up several times this week. Is it within my rights to talk to them about it? J.B., BROOKLYN

Correct answer:

Rights are imaginary. You could call them a “social construct,” even. It’s best to set them aside, because what you really want to know is the answer to two questions: first, whether you are entitled to speak with your neighbors about their crying baby, and second, whether you ought to do so.

In civil society broadly and in a community (like an apartment building) narrowly, any time you want something from anybody, you may ask for it. If the request is unreasonable, or if it’s presented unreasonably, you may not become angry, but there is no reason at all that you should think that you are forbidden from asking for something, or that you don’t have a “right” to ask it.

While noise complaints can be a tricky matter to digest, the central question is whether the complainant’s expectations are reasonable. Unfortunately, what is reasonable changes in different circumstances: obviously by time of day, but also time of week and year, location, &c.

For example: in my view, a person’s decision to reside in New York City means that this person must accommodate himself to more noises, and more kinds of noises, at more times of day, than someone who lives in a rural or suburban environment. While I never heard my family’s neighbors from inside our suburban home in Rockville, Maryland, I hear my neighbors, in one form or another, every single day in New York, and it would be unreasonable for me to expect never to hear them.

I have never made a noise complaint, in part because the noises are mostly kept to a minimum after 11 pm, and because sounds like somebody occasionally coughing or slamming a door don’t strike me as excessive or disrespectful, and because I’m sure that I sometimes make noises that other people can hear, too. But I also take efforts to prevent my habits from bothering other people: I have trained my dog carefully over many years not to bark, and I keep an eye on the volume of my stereo by noting the decibels displayed by my receiver.

Suppose I never gave my dog any instruction at all about barking, and he barked loudly and constantly in the middle of the night, or suppose I watched action movies loudly at 4 am. Then my neighbors would have a problem, and they would be right to make their problem into my problem. The fact that your neighbors’ instrument is a baby instead of a dog or a stereo is immaterial. While you should be expected to be more tolerant, as a New Yorker, of inevitable city sounds at any time of day, crying babies are not inevitable, and your neighbors’ crying baby is bothering you at a time – the middle of the night – when they have heightened responsibility that they have shirked.

Your desire not to be woken up and kept awake by a crying baby in your own apartment is reasonable. You should ask your neighbors to quiet their baby when it cries at night. If they are not prepared to do so, then they should pay for soundproofing immediately, or they should be prepared to raise their baby in a more isolated setting.

Filed Under: Ethicist

I made a correct prediction

Saturday 31 January 2015

Back in 2012, I predicted that Google Offers would fail:

… This is not how a service works when its developers actually want it to succeed.

While the Google Offers home page is still up and doesn’t explicitly state that the service has been shut down, Wikipedia writes about Google Offers in the past tense and says:

In 2014 Google announced it would be shutting the service down.

Filed Under: Blog

Red Rock Canyon

Sunday 16 November 2014

Red Rock Canyon

Filed Under: Photos

Cajun Swamp Tour

Sunday 16 November 2014

Cajun Swamp Tour

Filed Under: Photos

Nakamoto v. Newsweek

Saturday 15 November 2014

Back in March, after Newsweek reporter Leah Goodman published an article claiming to have identified Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, I defended Newsweek and her from many scurrilous arguments that she was either wrong about Nakamoto or wrong to out him publicly.

Now Nakamoto is raising money from the public, ostensibly to sue Newsweek.

He has not, however, to the best of my knowledge, actually filed suit against Newsweek or Leah Goodman.

His extremely frail and minimal response to the Newsweek article should be taken as further evidence that he is, in fact, the man who created Bitcoin. If he was not the right man at all – if Goodman was 100% wrong and if Newsweek had published an article that was simply untrue – he would easily have a case against them for libel, not to mention intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress. If he genuinely had nothing to do with Bitcoin, he’d easily be able to find an attorney to represent him pro bono. In court, I would expect him to account for his time during the years when he wasn’t working and Bitcoin was being worked out and launched.

But he’s acting exactly like someone who knows he’s been caught doing something that (probably) isn’t a crime but who doesn’t want to take responsibility for it publicly.

To review: the person who started the Bitcoin project used the name Satoshi Nakamoto. That must either be the person’s real name or, a fake name with some meaning, or a fake name with no meaning at all…

…If it’s the person’s real name, we can be sure that Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto is the Satoshi Nakamoto who created Bitcoin, because there are only a few other Satoshi Nakamotos in the world, and none of them is a libertarian engineer with a known interest in currencies (the detective work leading to this information is Goodman’s contribution).

…If it’s a completely fake name with no meaning at all, then why and how would someone randomly have chosen these two words, Satoshi and Nakamoto, that together form the name of a libertarian engineer with a known interest in currencies?

…If it’s a fake name with some meaning, the meaning has got to be that Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto has been framed. But framed by whom? For what purpose? None of his defenders will say why someone would create Bitcoin and then use Nakamoto’s name for it.

Filed Under: Blog

City Skyline at Twilight in Autumn

Saturday 15 November 2014

City Skyline at Twilight in Autumn

Filed Under: Photos

Worst linkedin outreach ever

Friday 14 November 2014

Here’s a message I got on Linkedin:

Worst linkedin outreach ever

Hello Natan, This is Rony Sebastian,President,Softnotions. It’s been
great to connect with you.

We are expanding our network in the corporate space and I’ve been
tasked with finding suitable people / companies to open discussions
with

Looking forward to talk to you soon.

regards R K S

I’ve never met this fellow or heard of him in my life.

There’s no way that he can reasonably say that it’s been great to connect with me, because he hasn’t connected with me.

“Expanding our network in the corporate space” and “finding suitable people / companies to open discussions with” are pretty uninspiring.

Does this sort of approach actually work for anybody?

Filed Under: Blog

Autumn leaves in Central Park

Friday 14 November 2014

Autumn leaves in Central Park

Filed Under: Photos

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • …
  • 59
  • Next Page »